Defense strategies of cotton against whitefly transmitted CLCuV and Begomoviruses

Muhammad Azmat Ullah Khan, Ahmad Ali Shahid, Abdul Qayyum Rao, Naila Shahid, Ayesha Latif, Salah ud Din, Tayyab Husnain

Abstract


Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) is economically important monopartite Geminivirus which is transmitted by whitefly in persistent circulative manner. In Pakistan, CLCuV causes severe damage to Gossypium hirsutum whereas G. arboreum is resistant to this virus. A total of 86 articles were included in this study that were searched through web of knowledge, web of science and google scholar by using the keywords of cotton, CLCuV, waxes, Begomoviruses and transgenic techniques used against Begomoviruses in plants. Various transgenic strategies i.e., pathogen derived resistance (with and without protein expression) and non - pathogen derived resistance have been adopted to control this virus or its vector. Beside these, some natural defense mechanisms of plant also protect it against the vector. The cuticular waxes make the insects’ attachment difficult to plant surfaces and act as a physical barrier. The cuticular waxes in G. arboreum act as first line of defense against whiteflies and thus CLCuV. Some other defense strategies may involve hindering the insect movements or depriving it from food due to thick waxy layer. Biotechnological strategies against various Begomoviruses including CLCuV were found successful in some crops except cotton. Whereas, the natural defense strategies in G. arboreum i.e., long trichome or presence of inorganic salts with increased concentration of waxes, provide good defense strategy against whiteflies, CLCuV and other pathogens.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Weete JD, Leek GL, Peterson CM, Currie HE, Branch WD. Lipid and surface wax synthesis in water-stressed cotton leaves. Plant Physiology, (1978); 62(5): 675-677.

Rahman M, Hussain D, Zafar Y. Estimation of genetic divergence among elite cotton cultivars–genotypes by DNA fingerprinting technology. Crop Science, (2002); 42(6): 2137-2144.

Jiang C-X, Wright RJ, El-Zik KM, Paterson AH. Polyploid formation created unique avenues for response to selection in Gossypium (cotton). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (1998); 95(8): 4419-4424.

Mansoor S, Briddon RW, Zafar Y, Stanley J. Geminivirus disease complexes: an emerging threat. Trends in Plant Science, (2003); 8(3): 128-134.

Sabahat H. Differential eefect of planting time on cotton leaf curl disease and yeild of cotton vriety CIM-598. Journal of Novel Research in Life Sciences, (2015); 2(1): 1-7.

Wheeler T, Gannaway J, Keating K. Identification of resistance to Thielaviopsis basicola in diploid cotton. Plant Disease, (1999); 83(9): 831-833.

Zafar Y, Mansoor S, Asad S, Briddon R, Idrees M, et al. Genome Characterization of whitefly-transmitted geminivirus of cotton and Development of Virus-resistant Plants through Genetic Engineering and conventional Breeding. ICAC Recorder USA, (2003); 12-16.

Borole V, Dhumale D, Rajput J. Embryo culture studies in interspecific crosses between arboreum and hirsutum

cotton. Indian Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding, (2000); 60(1): 105-110.

Huang G-T, Ma S-L, Bai L-P, Zhang L, Ma H, et al. Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Molecular Biology Reports, (2012); 39(2): 969-987.

Koonin EV, Senkevich TG, Dolja VV. The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells. Biol Direct, (2006); 1(1): 29.

Edwards RA, Rohwer F. Viral metagenomics. Nature Reviews Microbiology, (2005); 3(6): 504-510.

Dimmock NJ, Easton AJ, Leppard K, Dimmock N, Easton A, et al. Introduction to modern virology. Chapter: Book Name. 2007 of publication; Blackwell Pub. Malden, MA, USA.

La Scola B, Desnues C, Pagnier I, Robert C, Barrassi L, et al. The virophage as a unique parasite of the giant mimivirus. Nature, (2008); 455(7209): 100-104.

Moffat AS. Geminiviruses emerge as serious crop threat. Science, (1999); 286(5446): 1835-1835.

Gray SM, Banerjee N. Mechanisms of arthropod transmission of plant and animal viruses. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, (1999); 63(1): 128-148.

Gutierrez C, Ramirez-Parra E, Mar Castellano M, Sanz-Burgos AP, Luque A, et al. Geminivirus DNA replication and cell cycle interactions. Veterinary Microbiology, (2004); 98(2): 111-119.

Fauquet CM, Stanley J. Geminivirus classification and nomenclature: progress and problems. Annals of Applied Biology, (2003); 142(2): 165-189.

Varma A, Malathi V. Emerging geminivirus problems: a serious threat to crop production. Annals of Applied Biology, (2003); 142(2): 145-164.

Ribeiro S, Ambrozevicius L, Avila Ad, Bezerra I, Calegario R, et al. Distribution and genetic diversity of tomato-infecting begomoviruses in Brazil. Archives of Virology, (2003); 148(2): 281-295.

Brown JK, Czosnek H. Whitefly transmission of plant viruses. Advances in Botanical Research, (2002); 3665-100.

Seal S, Jeger M, Bosch FVd. Begomovirus evolution and disease management. Advances in Virus Research, (2006); 67297-317.

Lehmann Pa. Structure and evolution of plant disease resistance genes. Journal of Applied Genetics, (2002); 43(4): 403-414.

Stanley J. Analysis of African cassava mosaic virus recombinants suggests strand nicking occurs withinthe conserved nonanucleotide motif during the initiation of rolling circle DNA replication. Virology, (1995); 206(1): 707-712.

Brunetti A, Tavazza M, Noris E, Tavazza R, Caciagli P, et al. High expression of truncated viral Rep protein confers resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus in transgenic tomato plants. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, (1997); 10(5): 571-579.

Vanderschuren H, Alder A, Zhang P, Gruissem W. Dose-dependent RNAi-mediated geminivirus resistance in the tropical root crop cassava. Plant Molecular Biology, (2009); 70(3): 265-272.

Shepherd DN, Martin DP, Thomson JA. Transgenic strategies for developing crops resistant to geminiviruses. Plant Science, (2009); 176(1): 1-11.

Zrachya A, Kumar PP, Ramakrishnan U, Levy Y, Loyter A, et al. Production of siRNA targeted against TYLCV coat protein transcripts leads to silencing of its expression and resistance to the virus. Transgenic Research, (2007); 16(3): 385-398.

Chellappan P, Masona MV, Vanitharani R, Taylor NJ, Fauquet CM. Broad spectrum resistance to ssDNA viruses associated with transgene-induced gene silencing in cassava. Plant Molecular Biology, (2004); 56(4): 601-611.

Asad S, Haris W, Bashir A, Zafar Y, Malik K, et al. Transgenic tobacco expressing geminiviral RNAs are resistant to the serious viral pathogen causing cotton leaf curl disease. Archives of Virology, (2003); 148(12): 2341-2352.

Day A, Bejarano E, Buck K, Burrell M, Lichtenstein C. Expression of an antisense viral gene in transgenic tobacco confers resistance to the DNA virus tomato golden mosaic virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (1991); 88(15): 6721-6725.

Praveen S, Mishra AK, Dasgupta A. Antisense suppression of replicase gene expression recovers tomato plants from leaf curl virus infection. Plant Science, (2005); 168(4): 1011-1014.

Zhang P, Vanderschuren H, Fütterer J, Gruissem W. Resistance to cassava mosaic disease in transgenic cassava expressing antisense RNAs targeting virus replication genes. Plant Biotechnology Journal, (2005); 3(4): 385-397.

Abel PP, Nelson RS, De B, Hoffmann N, Rogers SG, et al. Delay of disease development in transgenic plants that express the tobacco mosaic virus coat protein gene. Science, (1986); 232(4751): 738-743.

Kunik T, Salomon R, Zamir D, Navot N, Zeidan M, et al. Transgenic tomato plants expressing the tomato yellow leaf curl virus capsid protein are resistant to the virus. Nature Biotechnology, (1994); 12(5): 500-504.

Briddon R, Markham P. Cotton leaf curl virus disease. Virus Research, (2000); 71(1): 151-159.

Shors T. Chapter 20. Understanding viruses: (2011). 1: 614-641. Jones & Bartlett Publishers

Soosaar JL, Burch-Smith TM, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Mechanisms of plant resistance to viruses. Nature Reviews Microbiology, (2005); 3(10): 789-798.

Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, et al. Chapter 3. Molecular Biology of the Cell, (1997). 1:95-106. Garland Science, New York.

Ding S-W, Voinnet O. Antiviral immunity directed by small RNAs. Cell, (2007); 130(3): 413-426.

Oparka KJ, Roberts AG. Plasmodesmata. A not so open-and-shut case. Plant Physiology, (2001); 125(1): 123-126.

Koch K, Barthlott W. Superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic plant surfaces: an inspiration for biomimetic materials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, (2009); 367(1893): 1487-1509.

Whitney HM, Federle W. Biomechanics of plant–insect interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, (2013); 16(1): 105-111.

Alcorn K, Whitney H, Glover B. Flower movement increases pollinator preference for flowers with better grip. Functional Ecology, (2012); 26(4): 941-947.

Lucas PW, Turner IM, Dominy NJ, Yamashita N. Mechanical defences to herbivory. Annals of Botany, (2000); 86(5): 913-920.

Post-Beittenmiller D. The cloned Eceriferum genes of Arabidopsis and the corresponding Glossy genes in maize. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, (1998); 36(1): 157-166.

Chachalis D, Reddy KN, Elmore CD. Characterization of leaf surface, wax composition, and control of redvine and trumpetcreeper with glyphosate. Weed Science, (2001); 49(2): 156-163.

Shepherd T, Robertson G, Griffiths D, Birch A. Epicuticular wax ester and triacylglycerol composition in relation to aphid infestation and resistance in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Phytochemistry, (1999); 52(7): 1255-1267.

Riederer M, Muller Chapter 20. Annual Plant Reviews, Biology of the Plant Cuticle, (2009). 35:165-192. John Wiley & Sons.

Lolle SJ, Pruitt RE. Epidermal cell interactions: a case for local talk. Trends in Plant Science, (1999); 4(1): 14-20.

Guilford WJ, Schneider DM, Labovitz J, Opella SJ. High resolution solid state 13C NMR spectroscopy of sporopollenins from different plant taxa. Plant Physiology, (1988); 86(1): 134-136.

Buschhaus C, Jetter R. Composition differences between epicuticular and intracuticular wax substructures: How do plants seal their epidermal surfaces? Journal of Experimental Botany, (2011); 62(3): 841-853.

Khan MAU, Shahid AA, Rao AQ, Kiani S, Ashraf MA, et al. Role of epicuticular waxes in the susceptibility of cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV). African Journal of Biotechnology, (2011); 10(77): 17868-17874.

Baur P. Mechanistic aspects of foliar penetration of agrochemicals and the effect of adjuvants. Recent Research Developments in Agricultural and Food Chemistry, (1998); 2809-837.

Kakani V, Reddy K, Zhao D, Mohammed A. Effects of ultraviolet‐B radiation on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) morphology and anatomy. Annals of Botany, (2003); 91(7): 817-826.

Carver TL, Gurr SJ. 12 Filamentous fungi on plant surfaces: Annual Plant Reviews, Biology of the Plant Cuticle. (2008); 23: 368. Wiley Publishers

Hall D, Jones R. Physiological significance of surface wax on leaves. Nature, (1961); 191: 95 – 96.

Gaume L, Perret P, Gorb E, Gorb S, Labat J-J, et al. How do plant waxes cause flies to slide? Experimental tests of wax-based trapping mechanisms in three pitfall carnivorous plants. Arthropod Structure & Development, (2004); 33(1): 103-111.

Bullock JM, Federle W. The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula. Insect Science, (2011); 18(3): 298-304.

Eigenbrode S. The effects of plant epicuticular waxy blooms on attachment and effectiveness of predatory insects. Arthropod Structure & Development, (2004); 33(1): 91-102.

Chang GC, Neufeld J, Durr D, Duetting PS, Eigenbrode SD. Waxy bloom in peas influences the performance and behavior of Aphidius ervi, a parasitoid of the pea aphid. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, (2004); 110(3): 257-265.

Mariani M, Wolters-Arts M. Complex waxes. The Plant Cell Online, (2000); 12(10): 1795-1798.

Hannoufa A, McNevin J, Lemieux B. Epicuticular waxes of eceriferum mutants o Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry, (1993); 33(4): 851-855.

Xia Y, Nikolau BJ, Schnable PS. Cloning and characterization of CER2, an Arabidopsis gene that affects cuticular wax accumulation. The Plant Cell Online, (1996); 8(8): 1291-1304.

Oosterhuis D, Hampton R, Wullschleger S. Water deficit effects on the cotton leaf cuticle and the efficiency of defoliants. Journal of Production Agriculture, (1991); 4(2): 260-265.

Bondada BR, Oosterhuis DM, Murphy JB, Kim KS. Effect of water stress on the epicuticular wax composition and ultrastructure of cotton Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf, bract, and boll. Environmental and Experimental Botany, (1996); 36(1): 61-69.

Barozai MYK, Husnain T. Development and characterization of the asiatic desi cotton (gossypium arboreum l.) leaf epicuticular wax mutants. Pakistan Journal of Botany, (2014); 46(2): 639-643.

Dellaert L, Van Es J, Koornneef M. Eceriferum mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. II. Phenotypic and genetic analysis. Arabidopsis Inforation Service, (1979); 16(1): 1.

Rostás M, Ruf D, Zabka V, Hildebrandt U. Plant surface wax affects parasitoid’s response to host footprints. Naturwissenschaften, (2008); 95(10): 997-1002.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62940/als.v2i2.105

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.